Ines, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2022-2-8, at 2:03, Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-quic-applicability-14 > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review Date: 2022-02-07 > IETF LC End Date: 2022-02-07 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > This document discusses the applicability of the QUIC transport protocol, > focusing on caveats impacting application protocol development and deployment > over QUIC. The document is well written and clear. > > I have one minor issue. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: > > Section 2 on the sentence: > > "While recent measurements have shown no evidence of a widespread, systematic > disadvantage of UDP traffic compared to TCP in the Internet" > > Statement of "no evidence of a widespread, systematic disadvantage" may be > seen as misleading when the example is about networks that simply block UDP > traffic without considering other possible disadvantages, moreover when one of > the references specifically states the opposite "3% failure is a lot". > Additionally references are rather old (2016) materials. Suggestion for > avoidance of doubt: > > "Measurements have shown 3-5% of networks blocking UDP, constituting a > disadvantage of UDP traffic compared to TCP in the Internet [Edeline16], > [Trammell16] [Swett16]. All applications running on top of QUIC must > therefore..." > > Nits: None > > Thanks for this document, > Ines. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
