Hi Thomas, all, Thank for the review. Will focus on the issue listed below and kindly invite the authors to reply to the other points in a timely manner. We went for informational rather than standard as initially advised in the charter because that's the right thing to do for such a document. We don't have valid arguments to motivate why we would put this doc in the standards track. Please note that IETF consensus applies for this document as per RFC8789. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Thomas Fossati via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> > Envoyé : dimanche 27 mars 2022 19:45 > À : iot-directorate@xxxxxxxx > Cc : draft-ietf-drip-arch.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; tm- > rid@xxxxxxxx > Objet : Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-arch-22 > > Reviewer: Thomas Fossati > Review result: Ready with Issues > > This is a great document and fun to read. Thank you authors! I have > tried to highlight a few small things that could be articulated a bit > more from an IoT perspective but overall I have no major concerns with > it, except a tangential thing around the document intended status (see > "Issues" below.) > > # Issues > > * The charter says: "the WG will propose a standard document that > describes the architecture […]" but the status is informational. I am > pretty sure informational should be appropriate, but highlighting a > potential disconnect. > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
