Re: [113attendees] HotRFC at IETF-113 -- 2nd call for participation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
    > I actually don't think it interacts much with 2026 although I do wonder

It's not so much that it interacts with 2026,etc. so much as that those
documents are wrong.

    > is contributing to general delays and some people's sense that it is
    > impossible to get real work done in the IETF in any efficient and
    > timely way.

I would say that it's contributing to a sense that people don't know what the
flavour of the day is.

    > While, as work-proposing mechanisms, the tone is certainly different
    > (especially along the fear of being attacked dimension you mention),
    > I'm not sure whether HotRFC is significantly different from the BarBOFs
    > of yesteryear.

Actual BarBOFs, in bars with napkins and beer (and no remote things to get in
the way), would be before HotRFC :-)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux