Fair enough… so disregard my comment re SCTP, but please do consider being precise about what port-aware means here. Thanks, cheers, Brian > On 15 Mar 2022, at 17:35, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=40ericsson.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> The document clearly explains the reliance of double-translation > approaches >> on ports in the transport layer, though it might be useful to note that > "port >> aware" means "has a 16-bit source port in network order at octet 0 and a > 16- >> bit destination port in network order at octet 2", and though I suspect > that >> very few shipping translators support SCTP, it'd be nice to note that SCTP > is >> indeed port aware. >> > > I would be careful here. If one applies NAPT per UDP/TCP model to SCTP it > will break SCTP. SCTP NAT is being worked on: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp/ > > /Magnus > _______________________________________________ > Tsv-art mailing list > Tsv-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
