On Mon, 10 May 2004, Noel Chiappa wrote: > So? Rob's not refusing to accept *any* email *at all* from you as a person > (just from a range of addresses which are generating email he doesn't like); > and you're more than savvy enough technically to get email to him via some > other path. As an IETF WG chair, he's obligated to follow the IETF rules on public participation. He can't block anything that the IETF mail server can't block: Public Participants. > He's not under any more obligation to accept email from you via whatever > channel you feel like using, no matter how onerous for him, than he is to > accept messages written on 12' long oak logs of 3' diameter. > > > Get a life, will you? Your constant whining and flaming is really getting > old. You're getting really close to the line at which I'd ask the Chair to > ban you from posting. Oh wait, I know what your response would be - you'd sue > us. And you seem to think the rest of the world is doing things which is > making you look bad. Here's another free clue: you're doing a far better job > of that than the rest of us could do with a decade of free time. I'm entitled to particpate, and I'm entitled to send email to the WG chairs as a participant. One thing I've noticed is that of none of the people criticizing me has thought to address the fact that OUR ADDRESS SPACE IS NOT HIJACKED, and that these people associated with the IETF: Paul Vixie, Joe Abley, Bill Manning, and Rob Austein as WG Co-chair in his role for IETF business, all claim that it is. But anyone can plainly see they are lying. Dean Anderson Av8 Internet, Inc _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf