third time same complaint, third time same answer.
No.
A WG chair is expected to read mail coming from the working group list. What he does with copies that go directly to him is his own business.
And as I have told you on the previous two instances of this complaint: Personal mail to you, including bounce messages, is not someone defaming you in the IETF, even when you choose to make it public.
Harald
--On 10. mai 2004 14:17 -0400 Dean Anderson <dean@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Point of order, please
It seems that WG co-chair has begun to use an email address that is defaming Av8 Internet, Inc by returning business email to users of Av8 Internet claiming that Av8 Internet has hijacked some address space.
Av8 Internet hereby demands that the IETF immediately end this behavior and halt the defamation of Av8 Internet, Inc by IETF representatives. IETF representatives must use email addresses that are not configured for defamation of Av8 Internet, Inc.
Dean Anderson Av8 Internet, Inc
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 20:17:23 -0400 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: dean@xxxxxxx Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Sun, 9 May 2004 20:17:14 -0400 from cirrus.av8.net [130.105.36.66]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <sra@xxxxxxx> (reason: 553 Service unavailable; Client host [130.105.36.66] blocked using dnsbl.sorbs.net; Hijacked/Disused Netblock See: http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=130.105.36.66)
----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mx-1.isc.org.:DATA<<< 553 Service unavailable; Client host [130.105.36.66] blocked using dnsbl.sorbs.net; Hijacked/Disused Netblock See: http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=130.105.36.66 550 5.1.1 <sra@xxxxxxx>... User unknown <<< 554 Error: no valid recipients
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf