> Reviewer: Himanshu Shah > Review result: Ready Thanks for your review. > (suggested append..) > "and are capable of forwarding IPv4 traffic over non-IPv4 interfaces". > (end of suggestion - or something similar to that effect..). Right. Done roughly what you suggest. > While this topic is covered, it would be nice if its importance is mentioned > somewhere in introduction or in section 3. > > Such as - > "For hop-by-hop reachability distribution, it is important to facilitate > ICMPv4 "destination unreachable" from non-IPv4 Babel router to notify the > source about incomplete IPv4 path (i.e. dangling IPv4 path)." I most respectfully disagree. The issue of ICMPv4 is a complex one, and I'd rather not try to (mis-)summarise it in one sentence. There's a whole section devoted to it, and it's referenced from the introduction. (I am actually sympathetic to Warren Kumari's opinion that it's complex enough to deserve a whole document.) -- Juliusz -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
