Right — no action is being taken.
Also, I put a link to this discussion when closing the Status Change request so the history is not lost.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On February 18, 2022 at 2:54:36 PM, Rob Sayre (sayrer@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:50 AM John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:Alvaro,
Just to be sure the record is clear, there were objections to
changing the status of RFC 911. They were not claims that 911
is still of active interest but objections to the idea of making
changes to the status of _any_ status "Unknown" document,
especially of that vintage, without a coherent plan about what
to do about all of the others.Yes, and I'm not sure there was agreement on whether to do anything at all.fwiw, I think "Unknown" is a perfectly accurate description, so I'm not sure why we'd do the paperwork on these.thanks,Rob
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
