Hi Dan,
Thanks for your review. YANG and directorate reviews are part of IETF process. This document does not address IETF process, but rather the evolution of the process that oversees the RFC series and RFC editor.
As such, IMHO discussing YANG reviews or directorate reviews is out of scope.
Regards,
Eliot
On 14.02.22 16:35, Dan Romascanu wrote:
Hi,
I reviewed on behalf of the YANG Doctors team the four documents submitted for comments associated with the change in the RFC Editor model. My reading and review concerns only aspects related to documents related to YANG, containing or refering to YANG models and the review process of these documents.
Here are my findings and comments:
Ready
Ready with Issues
The document is ready from the perspective of the YANG Doctors, with one comment. The document does not mention in any place the role of the IETF Directorates and review teams such as the YANG Doctors in the IETF documents review process. As the reviews of these teams are part of the process I suggest considering adding text, possibly in Section 3.
Ready
Ready
Thanks and Regards,
Dan
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
