Thanks Brian for your prompt response.
No, not good to put 3 times the same reference. I was meaning smth like (if were available) https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rswg/about/ or https://www.iab.org/activities/programs/rfc-editor-future-development-program/. But since the WGs pages are not yet created, then reference is not needed.
Thanks,
Ines.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 4:54 PM Brian Rosen <br@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
InesThanks for your review. The RSWG and RSAB are created and defined in draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model, so with your edit, the same reference will appear 3 times. Do you think that’s really the right thing to do?BrianOn Feb 11, 2022, at 9:44 AM, Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready with Nits
Document: draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Date: 11-02-2022
Summary:
The document does not include technical details or major issues.
Minor suggestion for a better understanding:
""In [reference], the responsibility for the RFC series is moved to the RFC
Series Working Group [reference if applicable] and to the RFC Series Approval
Board [reference if applicable].
The RFC publication is no longer the responsibility of the RFC Editor and the
role of the IAB in the RFC Series is altered. Accordingly, in [reference], the
sentence "RFC publication is the direct responsibility of the RFC Editor, under
the general direction of the IAB" is deleted"".
Thanks for this document,
Ines
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
