looks good to me - one suggestion of clearer language and a potential
addition
> o Documents for which special rules exist, including IAB documents
> and April 1st RFCs, and republication of documents from other SDOs
> - the IESG and the RFC Editor keep a running dialogue on which
> documents these are
awkward wording - maybe you want to say
o The IESG and the RFC Editor keep a running dialogue on which
documents require special rules (for example, IAB documents,
April 1st RFCs, and republication of documents from other SDOs)
section 3
> The IESG may return five different responses
this misses one of the outcomes listed in RFC 2026 - specifically (quoting
from 2026):
"the IESG recommends that the document be brought within the
IETF and progressed within the IETF context"
this path has been used from time to time and I think it is a valuable
option - I'd suggest that it be added as a 6th response
Scott
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf