Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Issues This is an artart Last Call review of draft-ietf-detndet-bounded-latency-08 This document is Mostly Ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but there are some issues to consider before publication. It's not clear to me who this document is intended to inform. While reasonably written, it feels more like part of a larger discussion without pointers to that discussion, and I'm not seeing the utility of publishing it in the RFC series as it is currently framed. I don't _object_ to it's publication, but please consider if the purpose and audience could be made more clear. I find the division of Normative/Informative references suspect. In particular, please reconsider whether the IEEE references, particularly IEEE802.1Q-2018 should be normative. The document uses AVB as an acronym for (I think) A vs B, but that three-letter-acronym is already well used in this space (even in other detnet documents) to mean Audio Video Bridge. Is this collision necessary? At section 7, "application of this document" is unclear. Consider expanding what you mean to say. I think you mean something like "an example use of the models in this document to inform the admission of a detnet flow"? I support Ralf Weber's comments. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
