On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 12:23 PM Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Paul Hoffman wrote on 21/01/2022 16:38: > > This seems like a lot of effort for no defined (or discernible) value to > > the RFC-reading community. > > what's the long term plan with rfc garbage collection at the ietf? To > leave obsolete documents accrete indefinitely, or to implement some form > of pruning, either ad-hoc or more systematic? Why isn't the obsoleting of RFCs by later versions and the occasional declaration of an RFC as Historic sufficient pruning? Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx > Nick -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
