In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404271736160.27330-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dean Ande
rson writes:
>On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>> You're confusing URI methods, protocols, and TLDs disastrously.
>I think it is you who is reading too much into the .tel and .mobi TLD.
>These are not proposals to put URI method functionality into domain names,
Sure there are.
yes. They are. And they do not make any technical sense that way.
We should make a clear response: - these propostions are not acceptable as TLD - please correct them as schemes propositions.
I confuse people enough with my Franglish grammatical mistakes to know how confusing it would be for people iI ICANN accepted a DNS grammatical mistake.
Unfortunately people wasted $ 50.000 in fear others could obatain ".tel". Good $ 100.000 bonus for ICANN. Last time they only got two TAF (TLD Application Fee) of $ 25.000. I understand no one from ICANN wants to say they will respect the DNS semantic: next time they may put the TAF at $ 100.000 ....
jfc
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf