RE: [Ietf] 240.0.0.0/4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Daniel Senie wrote:
> 2) Make available several chunks of space for RFC1918
> usage, perhaps a few /8's, a whole mess of /12's, and
> many /16's. This space does two things: First, it
> provides additional private address space, which is
> needed. Second, it provides a usage battleground for
> class E space testing. There is the very real
> possibility users of these blocks will run into
> trouble as vendors have special handling for class E.
> By allowing these to be discovered during use in
> private networks, there is a much better chance of
> public usage of these blocks later.
> I do NOT agree that the entire class E space should go
> to RFC 1918. That seems wasteful. But using some large
> chunks of space for that purpose clearly provides a
> test bed to prove out equipment before eventual public
> address usage in that region of IP address space.

Makes a lot of sense to me.

Michel.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]