Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 02:55 PM 04-11-2021, Bron Gondwana wrote:
So back to the topic:

What can we do here? We need to find SOME wording that gives a (to use a sports metaphor) "play the ball, not the player" - and have a SAA who can give you a timeout if you start kicking a player rather than kicking the ball.

I'm not sure I'm seeing an answer in this thread yet which compels me more than "unprofessional" or "uncivil". Is there a word for "focusing on a proxy for the issue rather than the actual issue", or "repeating the same thing over and over without listening to, or by mis-characterising, responses" because that's often what I see underlying poor behaviour on our IETF lists, and we do need some boundary on what's allowed.

Sometimes, a message about "conduct" is sent to a mailing list to ask each side to pause the discussion instead of pushing for an opinion which is completely at odds with the other side.

The actual issue is mistrust.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux