Hi John! Thanks for the review. More inline ... > -----Original Message----- > From: John C Klensin <klensin@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 5:14 PM > To: The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: draft-danyliw-replace-ftp-pointers@xxxxxxxx; The IESG <iesg@xxxxxxxx>; rfc- > editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Protocol Action: 'Updating References to the IETF FTP Service' to > Proposed Standard (draft-danyliw-replace-ftp-pointers-06.txt) [snip] > So a quick question: What is the justification for classifying > this as a Proposed Standard? [snip] > At least according to what I see in the datatracker, this question did not come > up during the IESG review either. [snip] > I > think an explanation is in order and/or perhaps a pre-publication change to > BCP. This question came up even earlier than IESG review, in IETF Last Call: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/oMhqRigr4nbRSMll5NY4zXpZu20/ Regards, Roman
