Hello Tianran, hello Carsten, thank you for your input on this document. On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:40:50AM -0700, Tianran Zhou via Datatracker wrote: > I do not think "an extension registry that's only "specification required"" > should be the reason for informaitonal. this point was discussed in today's CBOR interim meeting, and considering this thread, input from the interim including from Francesca as responsible AD, we chairs agree that this can be moved to standards track without the need for further discussion. Carsten, please switch the document over to standards track with your next upload (and poke me if I don't update my shepherd review to reflect the changed situation right after that). Best regards Christian -- To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers. -- Bene Gesserit axiom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
