Okay, I read draft-iesg-rfced-documents-00.txt regarding a proposed change in IESG policy regarding RFC-Ed documents.
I'm opposed to the change, because I believe it would make it too easy for harmful documents to be published as RFCs.
As I'm sure you well know, the RFC Editor takes very seriously their obligations to provide thorough review of non-IETF documents. In fact, what makes you think that the IESG is more conservative than the RFC Editor?
Eliot