It appears that Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >I believe it is important for the IETF to say something that has the force of IETF consensus behind it. Instructions to the RFC Editor have not, and I would >be against doing so in this case because the lack of consensus makes the editorial changes less well-justified. > >If the consensus is that we should not do this, I would be highly disappointed, but I would accept it as a consensus decision. Language policing is not part of the RFC Editor's job. If the IETF wants to set language standards, that is fine, but it is up to the IETF itself to follow and if need be enforce those standards, not anyone else. R's, John
