Re: DNS vs PKI, was Quic: the elephant in the room

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It appears that Viktor Dukhovni  <ietf@xxxxxxxx> said:
>Ben's claim that CAs are "more secure" than DNSSEC is demonstrably
>in error in a world where all that CAs do is issue DV certs that
>attest to "domain control".

More than that, the security of your DNS depends on the providers in
the chain between you and the root, which is typically short, and over
which you have a lot of control. If you have a valuable domain, you
can use a high security registrar that applies controls to zone
changes. With PKI, your security is only as good as the worst of all
of the CAs in someones browser, nearly all of which have no relation
to you and most of which you've never heard of.

This is not a new argument and I doubt we're going to say anything new here.

R's,
John

PS: I know about CAA, but if you believe it matters, that means CA
security can be at best as good as DNS security.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux