Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Apr 6, 2021, at 5:26 PM, Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> At this point I think the best compromise is for the IESG to indicate
> its terminology preferences to the RSE and hope the RSE enforces them
> (which, they almost certainly would).

“Hope the RSE enforces them”. Enforcement would be a significant step beyond the mere “recommendation” that was in the proposed charter. I’m surprised you’re advocating for this more prescriptive approach. 

—John




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux