On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 05:30:39PM -0400, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > On the other hand, regarding your followup comment, for the IESG to decide > that some terms should be banned without having a community process would be > a very bad result. Fortunately, they have not proposed to do so. Indeed, we can agree on this. However, please see my earlier context post about this. We've seen much too heavy-handed an approach by the IESG, and many serious arguments ignored. Faking or manufacturing consensus will do, process-wise, but it is not a good idea. Perhaps TERM WG can be an opportunity for a reset, and if it is chartered, I hope so, though I fear it will be just more of the same.
