On 4/5/2021 7:11 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
For some reason I can't find the original announcement, so I'll just do this bare.
Given the general language of RFC 2418, my best take is that it's inappropriate for the IETF to charter a working group on this topic. It's not a technical topic, and it does not fit the general WG model.
To my best recollection (which means I may have missed one), we've never chartered a WG solely for the purpose of writing documents that purport to modify the way the IETF does business.
*sigh* Ignore the above. Joel H reminded me of Poised, Poisson of the previous century and Newtrk of the previous decade. I'm sure there are others.
Yeah, it's pretty much every working group that has ever formed in the GEN area:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/concluded/#WGs-general-area
/a
