On 4/4/21 4:51 PM, Randy Presuhn wrote:
Hi - Is anyone else troubled by how this discussion has centered on whatever inconvenience might be "suffered" by authors and editors and has totally disregarded the considerations that would lead someone hoping to communicate more effectively to search for better terminology in the first place?
No, I'm troubled by how the IESG arbitrarily used the Guidelines for Conduct as an excuse to suppress criticism and dissenting voices in order to promote its political agenda while at the same time violating those Guidelines.
Keith
