Elwyn, thanks for the review. I entered a Discuss ballot based on my own review. Lars On 2021-3-5, at 17:12, Elwyn Davies via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Elwyn Davies > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-04 > Reviewer: Elwyn Davies > Review Date: 2021-03-05 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-03-16 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: The document is fine except that I think it would be appropriate to > give a brief explanation of the reason for the change and to clarify what > paths might be available to the expert if s/he decides to go outside the > SHOULD in bullet of s.1 > > Major issues: > None > > Minor issues: > s2.1, bullet2: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
