Hi Linda, The current registration procedure (visible at https://www.iana.org/assignments/lost-location-profiles/lost-location-profiles.xhtml) of Standards Action only requires a standards-track RFC to get an allocation; there is no designated expert involved in that procedure. RFC 8126 again remains a good reference for these registration policies. Thanks, Ben On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 05:12:52PM +0000, Linda Dunbar wrote: > Murray, > > Then why need this document? > Isn’t it already the practice that “The IESG will be tasked with appointing a designated expert (DE) to review registration requests against the published specification”? > > Linda > > From: Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 11:46 AM > To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: secdir@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy.all@xxxxxxxx; ecrit@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01 > > Hi Linda, thanks for your review. Comments below. > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 9:34 AM Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx<mailto:noreply@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: > This document doesn't seem to be complete. The document claims that it changes > the policy of the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Location Profile > registry from Standards Action to Specification Required, but it doesn't > specify what is the new procedure. It says allowing other SDOs to change or > add values. But which SDOs are allowed? Are there any procedures to identify > which SDOs are legitimate? can any organizations, say XYZ, change, add or > delete the values? > > Specification Required is defined in RFC 8162. The IESG will be tasked with appointing a designated expert (DE) to review registration requests against the published specification. The DE will have discretion to determine whether an application should be accepted. The document contains no guidance about particular SDOs, so the DE is left to decide whether to factor the source into the approval or rejection of the request. > > So any SDO can make a request to update the registry. The DE makes the call about "legitimate". > > -MSK > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
