Now that IETF Week is over...
The concern you expressed in your Discuss on draft-crocker-inreply-react:
Discuss (2021-02-24 for -08)
I thought you were going to clean up whether the Content-Disposition was
"React" or "Reaction" based on the gen-art review, but the document still seems
internally inconsistent about it.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/zun860KMrKdwqyKSWbrvWSPMuYM/
indicates that "React" was the intent, but Sections 2 and 4.1 still use
"Reaction", while the IANA Considerations register "React". Section 3
uses lowercase "reaction" in the context of a "Content-Disposition"
header field as well. Section 7 mentions a "Reaction capability".
was resolved some version(s) ago.
If you still have a concern about the draft's use of its label, please
let me know. Otherwise it would be nice to let the draft finally
profess to the RFC Editor.
Thanks.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
