Re: We should have a Wheel/2 Research Group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: We should have a Wheel/2 Research Group
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 22:38:23 +0900
In-reply-to: <CAMm+Lwhj9ShK69Ay=EUy6kX67opuoYzMYu_Whp1qWZHAX9Hqxg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwhj9ShK69Ay=EUy6kX67opuoYzMYu_Whp1qWZHAX9Hqxg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0

Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

"This time, we are going to consider round"

(yes, this is IRTF, but...)


Not. It was IPng WG of IETF.

						Masataka Ohta

References:
- We should have a Wheel/2 Research Group
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker

Prev by Date: Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Mar 7 06:00:02 2021
Next by Date: Re: IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries
Previous by thread: Re: We should have a Wheel/2 Research Group
Next by thread: Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Mar 7 06:00:02 2021
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux