On 3/2/2021 8:23 PM, Randall Gellens wrote:
I think Ned's analysis was excellent. I wonder about the conclusion that a mechanism where some (upgraded) email thread participants see each other's reactions and (non-upgraded) others don't is worse than a mechanism that ties reaction to replies.
That's one of the reasons this design is superior to my original. The original would typically suffer the inequity you describe. The current one out to result in everyone have the images appear (assuming any ability to process emojis) but some would not have them specially process as been in reply.
For example, if something such as message disposition were to be extended for reactions, would that be worse than the non-reply reply?
not sure what you mean. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
