I don't KNOW that what I'm thinking is true, but I'm wondering to myself if the target audience for protocol specification maintenance is all in the IETF... Spencer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Rick Stewart" <rick.stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:48 PM Subject: Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection) > > > --On 8. mars 2004 12:38 -0700 Rick Stewart <rick.stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > >> Standard. In my experience the hardest part of getting a document > >> advanced is to collect the implementation report. > >> > >> Hence this modest proposal: > > > > [clip] > > > > I rather like the proposal. What's been lacking is any forum for further > > development of standards outside of mailing lists and IETF meetings -- > > there's no tracking, and that's a major problem. > > in draft-iesg-hardie-outline-01, the concept of a "maintenance team" > (called "IANA Team" in that document) was floated. This didn't get much > discussion. Is this something that's worth discussing as an idea? > > Harald > > > > > _______________________________________________ > This message was passed through ietf_censored@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, which is a sublist of ietf@xxxxxxxxx Not all messages are passed. Decisions on what to pass are made solely by IETF_CENSORED ML Administrator (ietf_admin@xxxxxxxx).