Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This is one of the reasons I would like to see the IETF move towards a
>> W3C style plenary in which WGs are required to provide short
>> introductions to what they do. No, not status reports: an elevator
>> pitch.
> We actually had similar plenaries, long ago, as a way to keep the
> broader community informed about what individual WGs were doing. First
> thing Monday mornings, as I recall.
Yes, my first IETF, 36 had that. By IETF40, they were gone, considered a
waste of common time. There clearly was some value that we are now partially
missing.
There have been a few IAB Tech plenaries and SAAG presentations that fall
into the elevator pitch. Tiru Reddy most recently did one on DOTS, for instance.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
