Hi, Christian,
On 25/2/21 03:01, Christian Huitema wrote:
On 2/24/2021 9:56 PM, Theresa Enghardt wrote:
Another way for academics to contribute is to implement (part of) a
draft as an academic exercise, or have a student implement it as a
project, and then give feedback to the Working Group. We have had
multiple such implementations in TAPS. Even if the implementation is
most likely not going to be widely deployed, and even if development may
not continue beyond the duration of a project, it is still helpful input
for the Working Group. And for the academic, it gives the implementer a
relevant and interesting project to work on, the implementer gets some
experience with IETF technology, and they get to make professional
connections, which can result in further collaboration. Definitely a
win-win, and something that I've seen happen at IETF hackathons.
Yes, there are many ways academics can contribute. Look for example at
the work Robin Marx did on structured QUIC logs formats and
visualization tools. Part of his PhD, but also a very valuable
contribution to the working group, with many implementation
standardizing on the log format that he proposed and running his tools.
That was great.
FWIW, for the most part we were implying the extent to which Academia
might e.g. fund participation. We'll certainly expand on this topic,
since the discussion regarding Academia is certainly incomplete/inaccurate.
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
