Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Alissa! We picked-up the changes below in -06.
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 11:11 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Stewart Bryant
> <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gen-art@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-
> method.all@xxxxxxxx; ippm@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-
> capacity-metric-method-05
> 
> Stewart, thanks for your review. Al, thanks for responding. I entered a No
> Objection ballot.
> 
> Alissa
> 
> 
> > On Feb 12, 2021, at 12:04 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> <acm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your review, Stewart!
> >
> > please see reply below,
> > Al
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@xxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 10:40 AM
> > ...
> >> Summary: A well written text ready for publication
> > [acm]
> > Thanks!
> >>
> >> Major issues: None
> >>
> >> Minor issues: None
> >>
> >> Nits/editorial comments:
> >> 8.4.  Running Code
> >>
> >>   This section is for the benefit of the Document Shepherd's form, and
> >>   will be deleted prior to final review.
> >>
> >> SB> I am wondering if this was supposed to be deleted before this
> review,
> >> or whether you plan to keep it?
> > [acm]
> > Yes, we'll certainly delete this section before the RFC Editors see it.
> However,
> > there is a lot of review yet to happen. I really don't mind if the IESG
> > sees it in some form, but we don't want to risk endorsing one
> implementation, IIRC.
> >
> > Also, this material could move to the Doc Shepherd's form, but has not
> yet:
> > 	Document Quality:
> >
> > 	Are there existing implementations of the protocol? ...
> >
> > I see that we need to update the reference in section 8.4:
> > OLD
> > [udpst]    AT&T, "UDP Speed Test Open Broadband project", August
> >              2020,
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/BroadbandForum__;!!BhdT!3e
> WTy-rSXgIyVrHTemHXduPaFjxrKLvjcfS9WjEPArAVl_pBmiRBvdId2g-JsFM$  <TBD>>.
> > NEW
> > [udpst]    udpst Project Collaborators, "UDP Speed Test Open Broadband
> project",
> >              December 2020,
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/BroadbandForum/obudpst__;!
> !BhdT!3eWTy-rSXgIyVrHTemHXduPaFjxrKLvjcfS9WjEPArAVl_pBmiRBvdIdvdpgG88$ >.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gen-art mailing list
> > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-
> art__;!!BhdT!3eWTy-
> rSXgIyVrHTemHXduPaFjxrKLvjcfS9WjEPArAVl_pBmiRBvdId7EcuIY4$

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux