Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Warren Parad <wparad=40rhosys.ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:36:13 +0100
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "oauth@xxxxxxxx" <oauth@xxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAJot-L0PS_3LxEkC-jd1aqXDdYF+z8BajSs4Rhx3LgRPn6wkdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+LwgbK3HYDjSHnTN3f6hWSQCQrEjHLNn6z0JpfY7hdxaQpg@mail.gmail.com> <A8128346-B557-472F-B94F-8F624F955FCE@manicode.com> <eb2eaaa7-7f7e-4170-ab87-1cc1fdd3359b@www.fastmail.com> <CAJot-L0PS_3LxEkC-jd1aqXDdYF+z8BajSs4Rhx3LgRPn6wkdQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2021-02-24, at 11:22, Warren Parad <wparad=40rhosys.ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Should we solve the NxM problem, and if so, how do you propose we do that?

Let GNAP do that.

Grüße, Carsten

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops
  - From: Warren Parad

References:
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
  - From: Jim Manico
- We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops
  - From: Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops
  - From: Warren Parad

Prev by Date: coders in IETF (was: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF)
Next by Date: RE: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
Previous by thread: Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops
Next by thread: Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux