Hiya, On 23/02/2021 08:18, Dominique Lazanski wrote:
One is different approaches to topics than the mainstream IETFapproach held by most IETF attendees. I am thinking about privacy/encryption...
That topic differs from others in this discussion in that the IETF has repeatedly debated it in lots of detail, and with many different opinions being factored in, and over decades, and has established a set of rough consensus positions after significant informed debate on a topic where IETF participants are pretty well qualified to claim expertise. Other aspects of this discussion relate to things where we've not really noticed that we even have a position, e.g. the use of terms that were considered ok in the past, but aren't today, or where we're not at all expert, e.g. handling our own biases. I think our approach to handling claims that we'd be better to change should validly differ in the above two cases - it is *much* harder to bring really new information in the former case than in the latter for example. Cheers, S.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
