Dan, thanks for your review. I agree with your point and hope to see some text added to address this. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Feb 4, 2021, at 9:56 AM, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02 > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review Date: 2021-02-04 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-08 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > This Document is Ready with one issue that I would suggest to clarify and > possibly apply edits before approval. > > Major issues: > > If my understanding is correct this document together with 7483bis will replace > RFC 7482 and RFC 7483 and advance them to Internet Standard. Sections 7 and 8 > will be taken out from the final published RFC. I believe that the relationship > with RFC 7482 needs to be detailed either in the Introduction or in a dedicated > version, in order to clarify for future readers and users the status of the 2 / > 4 documents. I also believe that a shortened version of the 'Changes from RFC > 7482' section now an Appendix should be included in the text of the document in > its final form. > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
