Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Niklas,

Many thanks for your review and comments.
Please see proposed changes inline.

Thanks
Bala'zs

-----Original Message-----
From: Niklas Widell via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 5:06 PM
To: iot-directorate@xxxxxxxx
Cc: detnet@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn-06

Reviewer: Niklas Widell
Review result: Ready with Nits

I have reviewed  draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn from IoT point of view, as part of IoT directorate document reviews.

The document specifies the DetNet IP data plane when operating on a TSN sub-network, and builds on RFC8939 and RFC8565 to do so.

The document is well-written and appears to be Ready (with some minor nits).

I did not identify any IoT related issues with the document.

Nits:

-  RFC8939 reference does not render as link in section 1, first paragraph, but works in the second paragraph. In section 3 again no link.
<Bala'zs> Reference seems to work now.

- Section 1, third paragraph: This sentence is strange: "As described in [RFC8939] no DetNet specific headers are added to support DetNet IP flows, only the forwarding sub-layer functions are supported inside the DetNet domain."
<Bala'zs> OK. I will separate sentences. Proposed change.
OLD TEXT
   As described in [RFC8939] no DetNet specific headers are added to 
   support DetNet IP flows, only the forwarding sub-layer functions 
   are supported inside the DetNet domain.
NEW TEXT
   As described in [RFC8939] no DetNet specific headers are added to 
   support DetNet IP flows. Only the forwarding sub-layer functions 
   are supported inside the DetNet IP domain.
END

- section 2.2. Abbreviations DF and PREOF not used in rest of document.
<Bala'zs> OK, I will fix this.

- general, mix of using L2 and Layer-2
<Bala'zs> OK, I will fix this.

- general, there are some long, complex to parse, sentences that could perhaps be split or rephrased into something clearer. E.g. 4.2, third paragraph, "In cases of TSN-unaware IP DetNet nodes the TSN relay nodes within the TSN sub-network must modify the Ethernet encapsulation of the DetNet IP flow (e.g., MAC translation, VLAN-ID setting, Sequence number addition, etc.) to allow proper TSN specific handling inside the sub-network."
<Bala'zs> OK, I will discuss with native speaker co-authors.

- general, IEEE specs are referred to as "IEEE 802.1CB [IEEE8021CB]", which makes the many references to clauses long to read. Can't you just say e.g., "Clause 6.6 of [IEEE8021CB]" instead of ""Clause 6.6 of IEEE8021CB [IEEE8021CB]", except for maybe the first reference?
<Bala'zs> OK, I will fix this.


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux