Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04

["Valery Smyslov" <smyslov.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Kenneth,

 

I think this addition is OK.

 

Thank you,

Valery.

 

Hi Valery,

Thank you for the review.  Per your recommendation, I have added the following phrase to the beginning of the Security Considerations section:

"In addition to the security properties of iCalendar (see Section of [RFC5545]), ..."

Is this sufficient, or do you have alternative text that you'd like to see?

 

On 2/10/21 7:44 AM, Valery Smyslov via Datatracker wrote:

Reviewer: Valery Smyslov

Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing

effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These

comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.

Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other

last call comments.

The draft defines a set of extensions to the VALARM component of iCalendar.

The document is short and well written, its Security Considerations and Privacy Considerations

sections are sensible. I found the document ready.

Nit: I would recommend adding a sentence to the Security Considerations section saying that 

these VALARM extensions inherited security properties of iCalendar [RFC5545].

-- 

Kenneth Murchison

Senior Software Developer

Fastmail US LLC

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call