Hi Vijay, Many thanks for your review. I will fix your nits in the next version. (See inline) Thanks Bala'zs -----Original Message----- From: detnet <detnet-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 3:58 PM To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx Cc: last-call@xxxxxxxx; detnet@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls.all@xxxxxxxx Subject: [Detnet] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05 Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 2021-01-29 IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-05 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready to be published as a Proposed Standard. Generally, the I-D is quite heavy on acronyms, some of which I suspect comes with the domain the I-D targets. While I suspect that most readers versed in the area will not have any problems expanding the acronyms, I just wanted to mention this for the authors to perhaps do a once-over to see if any acronyms need expansion. (I list a couple in the Nits section.) Major issues: 0 Minor issues: 0 Nits/editorial comments: 2 - Figure 2: - What is "Tnl"? (Tunnel?) - What does "AC" mean? <Balazs> Thanks. Yes Tnl means Tunnel and AC means Attachment Circuit. I will update the figure. - IDnits is reporting a couple of unused references ([RFC5921] and [RFC8660]), and that draft-ietf-detnet-mpls has been published as RFC 8964. <Balazs> Ack. Thanks. _______________________________________________ detnet mailing list detnet@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
