Thanks for taking care of both of these issues Fernando! No further comments from my side.
Regards
Suresh
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 6:12 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Suresh,
>
> While double-checking that we have taken care of all comments received so far, I've realized that I had not responded to this one (apologies for that!). In-line....
>
>
> On 21/10/20 17:34, Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker wrote:
>> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
>> Review result: Ready with Issues
>> Minor
>> -------
>> * Section 3.1 Second Paragraph
>> Looks like there is a minor error in the DHCPv6 option handling. Suggest fixing
>> this
>> OLD:
>> This means that the advertised "Preferred Lifetime" and "Valid Lifetime" MUST
>> be dynamically adjusted
>> NEW:
>> This means that the advertised "preferred-lifetime" and "valid-lifetime" MUST
>> be dynamically adjusted
>
> Good grief! -- We've fixed this one. Thanks!
>
>
>> * Section 3.3
>> Are there any recommendations for the T1 and T2 times for the DHCPv6 IA
>> options? Or is the expectation that they will be set to 0.5 and 0.8 of the
>> shortest preferred-lifetime inside the IAs?
>
> The expectation is that they will be set to 0.5 and 0.8 of the shortest preferred-lifetime inside the IAs, as specified in Section 21.21 ("Identity Association for Prefix Delegation Option") of RFC8415.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
>
>
>
>
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
