Robert, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Jan 14, 2021, at 5:08 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-24 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 2021-01-14 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-01-20 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC > > I approached reviewing this document first by diffing it with RFC3501, then > doing a linear read-through. Errata seem appropriately handled. This looks like > it was a huge effort - it is very well done. I sent the few nits I could find > directly to the editors. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
