On 12/01/2021 22:15, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
(mpls) to consider the following document: - 'Updating the IANA MPLS LSP Ping
Parameters'
<draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-06.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2021-01-26. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
A recent IESG queried whether or not IANA could be a Normative
Reference; this I-D makes me hope that that question is resolved.
Abstract LSP needs expanding, not a starred abbreviation
RSC, DDMAP later, likewise
sun-TLVs appears 37 times; perhaps sub-TLVs
/[[RFC8209]/[RFC8209]/
3.1.1
'will be sent' perhaps MUST be
'may be silently ignored' perhaps MAY
6.1.3
'AM Problem/Delay' OAM?
Tom Petch
Abstract
This document updates RFC 8029 and RFC 8611 that both define IANA
registries for MPLS LSP Ping. It also updates the description of the
procedures for the responses sent when an unknown or erroneous code
point is found. The updates are to clarify and align this name space
with recent developments.
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
