Well, it would help if I went and looked again at the datatracker page
(shows what happens for taking short cuts due to having read the
document several times already.)
I support publicationa s an Informational RFC. (I think it would make a
good PS, but I udnerstnad why it is not going that way.)
Yours,
Joel
On 1/22/2021 4:42 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
This document addresses real world problems and provides an effective
solution. I support publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
Yours,
Joel
On 1/22/2021 1:49 PM, STARK, BARBARA H wrote:
I’m the document shepherd. I’m aware of the IPR claim and acknowledge
its existence. I’d like to see this draft published. There are
published BBF documents that reference it.
Barbara
*From:*last-call <last-call-bounces@xxxxxxxx> *On Behalf Of *David
Allan I
*Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2021 10:54 AM
*To:* last-call@xxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [Last-Call] <draft-allan-5g-fmc-encapsulation-07.txt>
Hi
I support this document as co-author. It addresses a specific problem
as described in the I-D.
With the exception of this LC I believe all other concerns and issues
raised during the process have been resolved.
Cheers
Dave
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
