Thank you, Mohit, Stephen, and Alyssa!
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:34 PM Alissa Cooper <alissa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mohit, thanks for your review. Stephen, thanks for your response. I entered a Yes ballot.AlissaOn Nov 25, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 25/11/2020 11:46, Mohit Sethi via Datatracker wrote:Reviewer: Mohit Sethi
Review result: Ready
Thanks. Will look at those nits when next editing.
Cheers,
S.I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area<OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc>_______________________________________________
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09
Reviewer: Mohit Sethi
Review Date: 2020-11-25
IETF LC End Date: 2020-11-30
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: This document deprecates older versions of TLS and DTLS. It also
updates many RFCs that normatively refer to the older TLS/DTLS versions.
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments: In section 1.1, typo in "waas defined to detect".
Most references to RFCs are of the form "[RFC7507]". Can we change "RFC 7457
[RFC7457]" to "[RFC7457]" for uniformity. Similarly, perhaps you could change
"RFC5246 [RFC5246]" and "RFC4346 [RFC4346]" to "[RFC5246]" and "[RFC4346]".
In section 2 "NIST for example have provided " should be "..has provided...".
In section 6 "this document is called out specifically to update text
implementing the deprecation recommendations of this document." I was
initially confused with the repeated usage of "this". Perhaps it would help to
be more explicit.
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Best regards,
Kathleen
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
