Reviewer: Watson Ladd Review result: Has Nits I read this document. I found it had very helpful and informative examples. My one complaint is a nit. My first issue is that https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.8.5 says all RFCs must have security considerations. Yes, even ones like this one listing example networks and failures. In this case a short reference to the security section of RIFT is entirely appropriate. I do have questions about the empty Acknowledgements section and the Contributors section with one person and address: seems a bit odd to me. Sincerely, Watson Ladd -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
