Hi Fernando,
[I moved the thread to ietf@xxxxxxxx]
At 12:31 PM 01-01-2021, Fernando Gont wrote:
There was an *error* in how the metadata for the document was set.
The track of the document had always been "Informational".
There is an assumption that the "verifications" [1] would catch such
an error.
I thought we had responded to all, but since we authors are mere
mortals, it could also be the case that we missed some. I will
review all received comments (and, in particular, any by Eric) and
respond if necessary.
That said, the document is being IETF LC'ed (rather than published
by the RFC-Ed), so we're just in time to address anything that we
may have missed before.
Are the authors of the opinion that it is unnecessary to respond to
the comments which were received?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1.
https://www.ietf.org/chairs/document-writeups/document-writeup-working-group-documents/
