On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, at 11:50, Keith Moore wrote: > > Well, speaking as someone with no authority, it appears to me that > > you are in the minority in that opinion, but I'll leave the AD to > > handle it. > This is a newly discovered issue, and there's been no input on this > besides from you and me. Hi Keith, BCP 195 very much constrains implementations already. I don't think your view holds here. (I know that argument from precedent is a logical fallacy in many cases, but I think that it's the best argument here.) Either way, the effect is the same: the document represents the consensus view of the IETF. Cheers, Martin -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
