Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-08.txt> (Additional Criteria for Nominating Committee Eligibility) to Experimental RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 12:29 AM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(Switching to the appropriate lists)

On 06-Dec-20 11:14, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
>
> draft>p3>goals>
> - Ensure that those eligible are true "participants" with enough...)
>
> AB> I think it is not explained the meaning of "true participant", or I don't think that this is defined in IETF. IETF participants are known by their WGs, so each participant can be known through WG lists and drafts.
>
> AB>change: true "participant" <to> known "participant".

The important part of the sentence is "with enough current understanding of IETF practices and people to make informed decisions." So this is more than "known" participants.

I think it would better to simply write:
Ensure that those eligible have enough current understanding of IETF practices and people to make informed decisions.


 thanks,

Regards
AB
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux