> FWIW, I think asking CFRG for comment (not approval) whenever
a new algorithm is introduced onto the standards-track is a
good idea, regardless of the WG from which the draft came.
Such checks don't mean anyone thinks badly of any algorithm,
the argument is it's better to ask a question in the place
where the expertise lies, just in case.
I don't disagree, but I CFRG should be asked if they are willing, and if they are, then such a change needs to be socialized. I am not sure it's fair to hold this draft up. I mean, it's not like it uses ROT-13.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
